[opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions
secret.argent at gmail.com
Fri Apr 2 10:12:02 PDT 2010
Starting a fork can light a fire under a parochial developer team. It
worked for GCC with EGCS.
On 2010-04-02, at 10:49, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> It's a lot of work to maintain, trust me - anyway, it'd be better to
> convince the opensim team to allow viewer developers in.
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Argent Stonecutter
> <secret.argent at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like an "impure opensim" fork is needed.
>> On 2010-04-02, at 08:19, Gareth Nelson wrote:
>>> If these people also work on the viewer, they're banned from
>>> contributing patches to opensim
>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe.com> wrote:
>>>> What is the reason that those fixes aren't incorporated in "pure"
> “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for
> everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” -
> Printcrime by Cory Doctrow
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
"Welcome back, Anonymous, we're glad to see you again!"
More information about the opensource-dev