[opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions

[Argent Stonecutter]

Starting a fork can light a fire under a parochial developer team. It  
worked for GCC with EGCS.


On 2010-04-02, at 10:49, Gareth Nelson wrote:

> It's a lot of work to maintain, trust me - anyway, it'd be better to
> convince the opensim team to allow viewer developers in.
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Argent Stonecutter
> <secret.argent at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like an "impure opensim" fork is needed.
>>
>> On 2010-04-02, at 08:19, Gareth Nelson wrote:
>>
>>> If these people also work on the viewer, they're banned from
>>> contributing patches to opensim
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What is the reason that those fixes aren't incorporated in "pure"
>>>> opensim?
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for
> everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” -
> Printcrime by Cory Doctrow
>
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

"Welcome back, Anonymous, we're glad to see you again!"