[opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

[Kelly Linden]

No. Account names must be unique. No new user can create ann.otoole OR
annotoole as a username, that name is taken by you.

 - Kelly

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Ann Otoole <missannotoole at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Do I understand you correctly that new accounts can make their name
> anything including existing account names?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Kelly Linden <kelly at lindenlab.com>
> *To:* Jesse Barnett <jessesa at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com; Baloo Uriza <
> baloo at ursamundi.org>
> *Sent:* Thu, August 19, 2010 11:27:21 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Jesse Barnett <jessesa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> baloo198731.resident        Plenty of names available.
>>
>
> I just wanted to point out that this theoretical new user's username would
> be baloo198731, it would not be baloo198731.resident. The 'Resident' isn't
> really a part of a new user's identity. It is only shown to viewers that do
> not support display names and legacy LSL script calls - in other words that
> last name is only there when required for backwards compatibility.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20100819/5795e4ef/attachment-0001.htm