[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

Rob Nelson nexisentertainment at gmail.com
Sun Aug 22 08:29:45 PDT 2010


  (Replied offlist by accident.)

  Funny how you allow Phox and crew to continue operating after they
purposefully leak info and attack a website, and then you ban me for
running a freakin' rental company to help pay a friend's bills.

Get your priorities straight and either enforce ALL of your rules for
EVERYONE, or don't enforce them at all.

Rob
The guy who used to develop Luna before he got banned and started making
crap for Minecraft instead.

On 8/21/2010 8:34 AM, Brian McGroarty wrote:
>  On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Discrete Dreamscape
>  <discrete.dreamscape at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>  Actually, I prefer to remember him as:
>>
>>  1) The guy who hacked Emerald's servers before discovering the data
>>  storage issue and
>>
>>  2) The active developer of a malicious viewer under the lolguise of
>>  promoting exploit/bugfixing.
>>
>>  But hey, they keep antagonizing him, so of course this kind of thing continues.
>  Yeah, he's no saint from these or a hundred other things said about
>  him. Ditto the Emerald leadership. For us though, the problem begins
>  if a pissing match extends to SL or resis' use of SL.
>



More information about the opensource-dev mailing list