[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 2010-08-22, at 15:20, Will wrote:

> Then this is confusing, to be listed you have to within the policy 
> "approved" for lack of a better word:
> Someone please clarify-
> 
> "If a Third-Party Viewer or your use or distribution of it violates
> this Policy or any Linden Lab policy, your permission to access
> Second Life using the Third-Party Viewer shall terminate
> automatically."
> 
> To me it sounds like any viewer not on the list is not approved and that 
> means by their own statement it will not be allowed to connect.

Listing in the TPV list is not "approval". Removal from the list implies but does not guarantee "disapproval".