[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

[Henri Beauchamp]

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:36:13 +0200, Altair "Sythos" Memo wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:30:20 +0200
> Henri Beauchamp <sldev at free.fr> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:10:00 +0100, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> > 
> > > There isn't anything in the policy itself which says you must be
> > > listed, there is however a note on the directory page warning users
> > > to be wary of unlisted viewers.
> > 
> > Which is a non-sence.
> 
> sorry cannot see the no-sense,

The non-sense is about LL saying "be wary of viewers not listed in this
directory" (while the TPV policy clealy states that to be compliant, a
viewer does NOT need to be listed in the directory) and then "we can't
give you any guarantee for the viewer listed in this directory".

Henri.