[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

[Miro Collas]

I don't want to start a war of any kind, but let me suggest that you ask 
for evidence before believing what people say in chat or elsewhere. 
There are people who would love to see Emerald crumble, and have no 
problem deceiving, misleading or plain lying. I have seen this done on 
this list, in forums (SLU especially) and in group chat. So, be very 
wary of whose word you believe.

For my part, the interview on treet.tv was enough to convince me to 
remain an Emerald user. That combined with knowing Jessica enough to 
trust her word.

On 08/23/2010 04:24 AM, Jesse Barnett wrote:
> Really wish that was true but you saw Katharine's comments in irc.
> Absolutely nothing has changed with Emerald except for the servers.
> Here is hoping that both Philip and legal are not deceived so easily.
>
> Jesse Barnett
>
> On Monday, August 23, 2010, Tateru Nino<tateru.nino at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>     And now, perhaps, we can get back to the important stuff, like the
> viewer itself.
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>