[opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy
tigrospottystripes at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 11:38:49 PST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Could you please ask them to review everything and making it all as
specific and clear as possible? (i know that this is kinda the opposite
of what people usually try to do in legal documents like contracts,
EULAs etc, but it would really benefit the community to have things
spelled out to the last character, knowing what is and what isn't
allowed without doubts and without fear that things could be interpreted
differently by LL or some laywers or somthing would make developers and
users much happier)
On 24/2/2010 16:23, Soft Linden wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Soft Linden <soft at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson at hp.com> wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2010 02:16 PM, Gigs wrote:
>>>> You all realize this is massively incompatible with the GPL, right?
>>> Not at all. They're not restricting access to the code. They're
>>> restricting access to their service. And defining the terms under which
>>> that service is provided.
>> Mike's correct.
>> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know.
> There were some follow-on concerns about who's responsible for
> modified viewers that do non-compliant things, but misrepresent
> themselves as the viewer in the viewer directory. Legal's going to
> follow up with changes that make this more clear - they're still
> hammering out some of the specifics. But it's not as onerous as some
> of the interpretations so far; you're not going to get banned or lose
> your directory listing over someone else's actions.
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the opensource-dev