[opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update

[WolfPup Lowenhar]

Concerning your question about trying to build SG V2 using VS2010 cmake will
not even make the proj and other needed files so that you can even try to
build the viewer Using VS2010. As I have all three Visual Studio on my
windows 7 32-bit system and cannot get it to even build in VS2008. It will
only build with VS2005.

-----Original Message-----
From: opensource-dev-bounces at lists.secondlife.com
[mailto:opensource-dev-bounces at lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of
malachi at tamzap.com
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:09 PM
To: Ricky; opensource-dev-bounces at lists.secondlife.com; Philippe (Merov)
Bossut
Cc: opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update

Seeing as how the good ole boys at microsoft decided to kill vs08 has anyone
successfully built with 2010
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Ricky <kf6kjg at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:58:37 
To: Philippe (Merov) Bossut<merov at lindenlab.com>
Cc: <opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com>
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0 update

I figure that since the particular links I was looking at are marked
(in bold) with the word "Experimental" I figure that people realize
that it might be broken...  Even so, I've added a line of warning that
might help filter out the unhelpful.

Trunk build links updated on
https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe#Development_Versions

Ricky
Cron Stardust

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut
<merov at lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Hi Ricky,
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Ricky <kf6kjg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Any particular reason that http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowglobe
>> doesn't get it's experimental "trunk" build updated when these new
>> builds are released?  The current version up there is 2.0.1.3339
>> released April 27, 2010.
>
> No particular reason other than it needs to be done manually. The reason
> it's never been automated is that it gives us an opportunity to prevent
the
> wide dissemination of possibly bogus builds to unsuspecting casual users
> (those are trunk versions after all and we have seen the trunk badly
broken
> for days at a time in the past). People like you picking up build
> notifications from @sldev-commit are considered savvy enough to not be
> outraged if a trunk build fails rapidly.
>
>>
>> If there's no particular reason, I (or whomever gets to it first,) can
>> update those links.
>
> Please do! Wiki updating from the community is always appreciated. Thanks
> for doing this.
>
> Cheers,
> - Merov
>
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2923 - Release Date: 06/07/10
02:35:00