[opensource-dev] New topic: Snowglobe 2.0 way forward?

[Carlo Wood]

Who is going to reject a contribution to snowglobe?
Ok... some can write a technically perfect patch, but with an
impact that nobody wants, that's a fact (think about 2.0).
So there has to be line: at some point it has to be decided if a
patch should be accepted; but how does that work?

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:20:44PM -0500, Mike Monkowski wrote:
> Except for Merov's contributions, I don't think Snowglobe ever had a 
> planned direction.  The direction was just the sum of the contributions 
> people made to it.  And I expect it will continue that way.  If someone 
> thinks that chat needs to be fixed and they have the time to fix it, 
> then they probably will.  The real question is whether such a 
> contribution would be accepted.  I happen to think it would be dangerous 
> to reject such a contribution.
> 
> Mike

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe.com>