[opensource-dev] oh give me a break

New Hax newhaxx at gmail.com
Sun Mar 14 15:32:59 PDT 2010


I know better than to try to get rich off of selling ones and zeroes.

On 3/14/10, Glen Canaday <gcanaday at gmail.com> wrote:
> Then what are you doing in SL? Not making a living, I can assure you.
>
> Nor are you putting food on the table RL except perhaps by manual labor,
> which cannot be copied. Ex: Ditches need to be dug. The ditch-digger can
> be changed out, but that doesn't change the fact that even if you get a
> new digger, you still have a ditch when you're done.
>
> OSS/Free Software and Proprietary software are the diggers; they're not
> the ditch itself.
>
> On 03/14/2010 06:18 PM, New Hax wrote:
>> then what are you doing on an opensource list if you want your content
>> wrapped in DRM.
>>
>> sl will die if its not open. and you can't compare rl doors to the
>> internet. if you dont lock your rl door I can come in and take
>> something of yours that isnt replaceable.
>>
>> but on the internet as a content maker you can make INFINITE products
>> so you arent losing anything if i copy it and make no money off of it.
>>
>>
>> On 3/14/10, Marine Kelley<marinekelley at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> well I am a content creator, content theft is a problem to me, it is tied
>>> to
>>> IP rights which are a legal issue. And I am not one of those who say
>>> "content theft is inevitable, let's not do anything about it". Doors can
>>> be
>>> lock picked, that's not a reason for me to leave my door wide open.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 March 2010 23:04, New Hax<newhaxx at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3/14/10, Marine Kelley<marinekelley at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Err... Content theft has always been a problem, will always be a
>>>>> problem,
>>>>> and LL better be on the same page with developers, content makers and
>>>>> customers here.
>>>>>
>>>> content theft isn't a problem, never has been a problem, and is the
>>>> nature of the internet and digital things.  if content makers are
>>>> worried about content "theft" then they shouldn't be on SL. because
>>>> its inevitable and cant be stopped.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>> privileges
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list