[opensource-dev] oh give me a break

New Hax newhaxx at gmail.com
Sun Mar 14 15:39:38 PDT 2010


agree to disagree yea but then your days are numbered in SL. If the
project forks then there will be a VW without all these restrictions
and lindens threatening people for asking them to keep their promises?

On 3/14/10, New Hax <newhaxx at gmail.com> wrote:
> I want a grid where people can have the freedom to develop what they
> want and do what they want, without being told whats allowed, and
> without being watched because you might move the wrong bits from one
> place to another. and without lindens threatening if we dont "play
> nice" with draconinan DRM. That was what i hoped the spirit of Open
> source SL would be. but i guess im wrong.
>
>
> On 3/14/10, Glen Canaday <gcanaday at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Then what are you doing here?
>>
>> On 03/14/2010 06:32 PM, New Hax wrote:
>>> I know better than to try to get rich off of selling ones and zeroes.
>>>
>>> On 3/14/10, Glen Canaday<gcanaday at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Then what are you doing in SL? Not making a living, I can assure you.
>>>>
>>>> Nor are you putting food on the table RL except perhaps by manual
>>>> labor,
>>>> which cannot be copied. Ex: Ditches need to be dug. The ditch-digger
>>>> can
>>>> be changed out, but that doesn't change the fact that even if you get a
>>>> new digger, you still have a ditch when you're done.
>>>>
>>>> OSS/Free Software and Proprietary software are the diggers; they're not
>>>> the ditch itself.
>>>>
>>>> On 03/14/2010 06:18 PM, New Hax wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> then what are you doing on an opensource list if you want your content
>>>>> wrapped in DRM.
>>>>>
>>>>> sl will die if its not open. and you can't compare rl doors to the
>>>>> internet. if you dont lock your rl door I can come in and take
>>>>> something of yours that isnt replaceable.
>>>>>
>>>>> but on the internet as a content maker you can make INFINITE products
>>>>> so you arent losing anything if i copy it and make no money off of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/14/10, Marine Kelley<marinekelley at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> well I am a content creator, content theft is a problem to me, it is
>>>>>> tied
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> IP rights which are a legal issue. And I am not one of those who say
>>>>>> "content theft is inevitable, let's not do anything about it". Doors
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> lock picked, that's not a reason for me to leave my door wide open.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 March 2010 23:04, New Hax<newhaxx at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/14/10, Marine Kelley<marinekelley at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Err... Content theft has always been a problem, will always be a
>>>>>>>> problem,
>>>>>>>> and LL better be on the same page with developers, content makers
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> customers here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> content theft isn't a problem, never has been a problem, and is the
>>>>>>> nature of the internet and digital things.  if content makers are
>>>>>>> worried about content "theft" then they shouldn't be on SL. because
>>>>>>> its inevitable and cant be stopped.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>>>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>>>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>>>>> privileges
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>>>> privileges
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>> privileges
>>
>


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list