[opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Nicky Perian nickyperian at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 4 10:14:14 PDT 2010


Libraries, Libraries, Libraries and MS redistribution hell.



________________________________
From: Ann Otoole <missannotoole at yahoo.com>
To: Brendan Wilson <wolfpup67 at earthlink.net>; OpenSource Mailing List 
<opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com>
Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 12:10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture


Why would anyone be burning time on VS2008 when VS2010 is the current 
environment?





________________________________
From: Brendan Wilson <wolfpup67 at earthlink.net>
To: OpenSource Mailing List <opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com>
Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 9:00:33 AM
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

 
Not yet they have just started working on bring it to VS2008 and even doing that 
is by a lot of effort from the OS community there even a jira on at least bring 
it to VS2008(vc90)
 
From:opensource-dev-bounces at lists.secondlife.com 
[mailto:opensource-dev-bounces at lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of Ann Otoole
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:11 AM
To: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence); opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture
 
Has this project code been brought forward to Visual Studio 2010?
 

________________________________
 
From:Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <oz at lindenlab.com>
To: opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com
Sent: Fri, September 3, 2010 9:32:54 AM
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

  On 2010-09-03 9:14, Lawson English wrote:
>    On 9/2/10 8:13 AM, Talia Tokugawa wrote:
>> [...]
>> I know this has been suggested before as friends have suggested it.
>> Why not make the viewer more Modular? Introduce a plugin architecture.
>> Allow any user to "build" their own client that fits their needs and
>> requirements.
>>
> Its a HUGE undertaking to do that. LL wasn't willing to tackle the issue
> directly years ago and they probably don't have the resources to do it
> now. It would have to be a community-lead effort and I'm not sure that
> developers are willing to invest the time to refactor the viewer at that
> level unless LL will be willing to seriously consider using the
> resulting re-architectured viewer.

Try us...

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3113 - Release Date: 09/04/10 
02:34:00



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20100904/2b0d3b4f/attachment.htm 


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list