[opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?
leliel.mirihi at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 01:57:53 PST 2011
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
<oz at lindenlab.com> wrote:
> The real distinction, I think, is whether or not you are using
> _installed_ libraries. Normally, the viewer build has only minimal
> reliance on the libs that are installed on the system itself
In other words the viewer is normally built as a standalone
application, i.e. the STANDALONE option does the exact opposite of
what you'd expect given the definition of the word. So why not just
invert the meaning of STANDALONE?
More information about the opensource-dev