[opensource-dev] Version numbering

Trilo Byte trilobyte550m at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 12:35:00 PST 2011


2.9 and 2.09 are two very different version numbers.  But the point of my email is that now that LL has re-versioned and released 2.5.1 officially, shouldn't the development snapshot get bumped up to 2.5.2 or 2.5.3?

On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Kadah wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I believe versioning numbers would go from 2.9 to 2.10 instead of 3.0
> 
> I think SL has used the non-decimal numerical school of thought for
> versioning on the viewers, like with Viewer 1
> 
> On 3/4/2011 6:45 AM, Trilo Byte wrote:
>> I understand the rationale behind dialing back the version numbering to 2.5.1 (it put the viewer on a path towards 3.0 much sooner than may have been desired), but seeing as 2.5.1 was given an official release yesterday shouldn't the development snapshots be on 2.5.2 to avoid confusion?
>> 
>> TriloByte Zanzibar
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNcUJQAAoJEIdLfPRu7qE2PvUH/3ClfHAFpBjKR8rMAxQjiC7w
> dB7F7iWdi+ASU/LvtWf6VCEyI9WxYH01CqdkwFSttvRSqLepligPnWeepSxF1GWi
> lk0XUJkFPcR7IvjznVOlP2gJ35z4LXPzNqSaX2+E4TWeMXxiM/JgfqzSZOm2SsJd
> AnQ41r2KRAIdQLuA8uU9OMPrkQUUTbos2azmc1omnEV8ELJZm6lShbUIYKzQueiG
> 3t0MoATKq97hWLV/0oG5jIgjmWdIEhIY7hNfdERHU4d62AMPGG113SKUeLeRjOlx
> apD2//4sIQSpqxYpA68123E6f6IgC2F2EYhR6o1TThIhVDGuzd8exLfmD/uS/K4=
> =9DCZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the opensource-dev mailing list