[opensource-dev] ok wtf is this?
angel_of_crimson at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 5 20:13:14 PDT 2011
maybe their machines have more memory? maybe they didnt have the proper test? I dunno but i see it too...
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:22:07 -0400
> From: jhwelch at gmail.com
> CC: opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] ok wtf is this?
> A good way to follow what is happening in viewer-development is to
> subscribe to the commit mailing list:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave Booth <dave at meadowlakearts.com> wrote:
> > On 9/5/2011 11:14 AM, Tateru Nino wrote:
> >> Indeedy. An excellent catch. If it _is_ the memory pool, though, it is
> >> hard to figure out why unit-testing didn't catch the underlying fault.
> > At a guess, and this is total speculation because I havent done any side
> > by side test runs with the setting on and off yet followed by spelunking
> > through the logs, I suspect that the easiest way to escape notice in the
> > unit tests is if it's a flaw elsewhere that was masked by not using the
> > memory pool - unit tests could easily not catch that, things like that
> > usually show up in integration testing and UAT and well, that's what
> > folks like me are for isn't it - pulling a new build every day and
> > spending time inworld with it to see what breaks :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the opensource-dev