nickyperian at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 7 16:50:23 PDT 2012
As I understand.
1. Code reviews are against viewer-release only.
2. With viewer-development and viewer-beta, LL retains the right (not intention) to strip features and bug fixes at any time.
3. The development loop is closed at viewer-release and at times both viewer-release and viewer-beta can be reset to viewer-release. This reset would occur to remove all traces of an not in viewer-release feature.
IMO, it is fairly safe (not 100%) for TPV's to develop against viewer-beta.
> From: Boroondas Gupte <sllists at boroon.dasgupta.ch>
>To: Second Life Open Source Developer Mailing List <opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com>; Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <oz at lindenlab.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:18 PM
>Subject: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories
>From recent changes on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official mercurial repositories has changed again. Which repository should contributions be based on, now? And which one is now the recommended base for third party viewers?
>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the opensource-dev