[opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-1795 Ad-hoc messages are received even when "Only friends and groups can call or IM me"

[Jonathan Yap]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/536/#review1147
-----------------------------------------------------------



indra/newview/llimview.cpp
<http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/536/#comment1105>

    I think there may be something else wrong with this logic: you do not have calls/IMs restricted and someone is your friend, this would not show the message (false AND true produce false), or am I missing something here?


- Jonathan Yap


On Jan. 16, 2012, 11:33 a.m., Jonathan Yap wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/536/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 16, 2012, 11:33 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Viewer.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> With avatar A: check on Preferences->Privacy->Only friends and groups can call or IM me
> 
> Get together with:
> Avatar B (not a friend of A)
> Avatar C (a friend of A)
> 
> Using avatar B establish an ad-hoc chat with A and C and write a message
> 
> Observed result: Avatar A and C receive the message
> Expected result: Only avatar C receives the message
> 
> 
> This addresses bug STORM-1795.
>     http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/STORM-1795
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   doc/contributions.txt 4982ab91ef6a 
>   indra/newview/llimview.cpp 4982ab91ef6a 
> 
> Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/536/diff/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Created a 3-way ad-hoc session per Description.  Avatar C does not receive the message, but does get an ad-hoc session icon, even when B initiates the ad-hoc session.  I think this is correct behavior because C may change their preferences to allow messages from everyone.  You do not want to reject the session (that was handled by a different jira recently for blocked residents), only suppress messages.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Yap
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20120120/52d68115/attachment.htm