From laurent.bechir at madonie.org Wed May 1 06:48:44 2013 From: laurent.bechir at madonie.org (Laurent Bechir) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:48:44 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] Errors while building SL viewer In-Reply-To: <0038A193-7882-4388-A350-45E3A0730212@madonie.org> References: <9D31C05F-E8A2-4725-BC3B-388E5856AC10@madonie.org> <0038A193-7882-4388-A350-45E3A0730212@madonie.org> Message-ID: Error message has changed, but here is still one message : ld: warning: directory '/Volumes/Maison/laurent/Documents/Secondlife/Kirsten/linden/build-darwin-i386/packages/lib/release/Release' following -L not found Undefined symbols: "HACD::HACD::HACD()", referenced from: LLConvexDecompositionImpl::genDecomposition(int&) in libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) LLConvexDecompositionImpl::genDecomposition(int&) in libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) "HACD::HACD::~HACD()", referenced from: LLConvexDecompositionImpl::deleteDecomposition(int) in libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) ld: symbol(s) not found collect2: ld returned 1 exit status What I have done : I've built llconvexdecomposition from : https://bitbucket.org/WolfpupL/llconvexdecompositionos/src I've ended up with libllconvexdecompositionstub.a which I've put in packages/lib, packages/lib/release, and for the debug version in packages/lib/debug. Since it didn't work, I've made a copy of it and renamed it libllconvexdecomposition.a. Now I get this error message. Anyone to help me fullfill my dream of building this release on this beautiful May 1st day :) Le 30 avr. 2013 ? 22:58, Laurent Bechir a ?crit : > > I've fixed this error. There was a line missing in llsdmessagereader.cpp : > > default: // TypeLLSDTypeEnd, TypeLLSDNumTypes, etc. > > at the end of the switch part line 270. > > I have another error message : > > ld: library not found for -lllconvexdecomposition > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > Command /Developer/usr/bin/g++-4.2 failed with exit code 1 > hel > > hacd-darwin-20111130b for the libraries and the include files that I've put respectively in build-darwin-i386/packages/lib and build-darwin-i386/packages/include. I have > > kConvexDecomposition.h > llconvexdecomposition.h > ndConvexDecomposition.h > > in include > > libk_hacdConvexDecomposition.a > libnd_hacdConvexDecomposition.a > > in lib > > Is it the good files ? If yes, where should I put them to have them discovered by ld. If no, which version of convexdecomposition I should use in a third party build ? > > Thank you > > Le 29 avr. 2013 ? 02:24, Laurent Bechir a ?crit : > >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to build Kirten's viewer for my Mac and I get this error message : >> >> llsdmessagereader.cpp:270: warning: enumeration value 'TypeLLSDNumTypes' not handled in switch >> llsdmessagereader.cpp:270: warning: enumeration value 'TypeLLSDTypeEnd' not handled in switch >> >> I've tried to look in llsdmessagereader.cpp, llsdmessagereader.h, llsd.h and llsd.cpp, but I don't know what to do to fix that error. Any idea, please ? >> >> Thank you > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130501/0865720f/attachment.htm From Lance.Corrimal at eregion.de Wed May 1 06:50:14 2013 From: Lance.Corrimal at eregion.de (Lance Corrimal) Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:50:14 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? Message-ID: <3021432.cJ1oukyvLg@sai> Hi, I just noticed that a commit in viewer-beta removed the two scripts build_version.py and update_version_files.py from the scripts/ directory, is that supposed to be that way? What should be used now to update the different version files, other than vi? cheers, Lance From nickyperian at yahoo.com Wed May 1 09:43:19 2013 From: nickyperian at yahoo.com (Nicky Perian) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [opensource-dev] Errors while building SL viewer In-Reply-To: References: <9D31C05F-E8A2-4725-BC3B-388E5856AC10@madonie.org> <0038A193-7882-4388-A350-45E3A0730212@madonie.org> Message-ID: <1367426599.46432.YahooMailNeo@web126103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> I'm guessing it has been awhile since you built a viewer. Another guess it is not an SL viewer as you are looking for HACD. Suggest you look at Dolphin, Firestorm, or Kokua and sort out the library changes from their sources. Nicky >________________________________ > From: Laurent Bechir >To: opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com >Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:48 AM >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Errors while building SL viewer > > > > > >Error message has changed, but here is still one message : > > >ld: warning: directory '/Volumes/Maison/laurent/Documents/Secondlife/Kirsten/linden/build-darwin-i386/packages/lib/release/Release' following -L not found >Undefined symbols: >? "HACD::HACD::HACD()", referenced from: >? ? ? LLConvexDecompositionImpl::genDecomposition(int&) ? ?in libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) >? ? ? LLConvexDecompositionImpl::genDecomposition(int&) ? ?in libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) >? "HACD::HACD::~HACD()", referenced from: >? ? ? LLConvexDecompositionImpl::deleteDecomposition(int) ? ?in libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) >ld: symbol(s) not found >collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > >What I have done : > > >I've built llconvexdecomposition from :? > > >https://bitbucket.org/WolfpupL/llconvexdecompositionos/src > > >I've ended up with?libllconvexdecompositionstub.a which I've put in packages/lib, packages/lib/release, and for the debug version in packages/lib/debug. Since it didn't work, I've made a copy of it and renamed it?libllconvexdecomposition.a. Now I get this error message. Anyone to help me fullfill my dream of building this release on this beautiful May 1st day :) > > > >Le 30 avr. 2013 ? 22:58, Laurent Bechir a ?crit : > > >> >>I've fixed this error. There was a line missing in?llsdmessagereader.cpp : >> >> >>default: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?// TypeLLSDTypeEnd, TypeLLSDNumTypes, etc. >> >> >>at the end of the switch part line 270. >> >> >>I have another error message : >> >> >>ld: library not found for -lllconvexdecomposition >>collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >>Command /Developer/usr/bin/g++-4.2 failed with exit code 1 >>hel >> >> >>hacd-darwin-20111130b for the libraries and the include files that I've put respectively in build-darwin-i386/packages/lib and build-darwin-i386/packages/include. I have? >> >> >>kConvexDecomposition.h >>llconvexdecomposition.h >>ndConvexDecomposition.h >> >> >>in include >> >> >>libk_hacdConvexDecomposition.a >>libnd_hacdConvexDecomposition.a >> >> >>in lib >> >> >>Is it the good files ? If yes, where should I put them to have them discovered by ld. If no, which version of convexdecomposition I should use in a third party build ? >> >> >>Thank you >> >>Le 29 avr. 2013 ? 02:24, Laurent Bechir a ?crit : >> >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>I'm trying to build Kirten's viewer for my Mac and I get this error message : >>> >>>llsdmessagereader.cpp:270: warning: enumeration value 'TypeLLSDNumTypes' not handled in switch >>>llsdmessagereader.cpp:270: warning: enumeration value 'TypeLLSDTypeEnd' not handled in switch >>> >>>I've tried to look in llsdmessagereader.cpp, llsdmessagereader.h, llsd.h and llsd.cpp, but I don't know what to do to fix that error. Any idea, please ? >>> >>>Thank you >>_______________________________________________ >>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > >_______________________________________________ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130501/824b97d4/attachment.htm From darien.caldwell at gmail.com Wed May 1 10:34:13 2013 From: darien.caldwell at gmail.com (Darien Caldwell) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 10:34:13 -0700 Subject: [opensource-dev] Errors while building SL viewer In-Reply-To: <1367426599.46432.YahooMailNeo@web126103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <9D31C05F-E8A2-4725-BC3B-388E5856AC10@madonie.org> <0038A193-7882-4388-A350-45E3A0730212@madonie.org> <1367426599.46432.YahooMailNeo@web126103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I had to do this, you can probably use these commits to get the bulk of the HACD code: https://bitbucket.org/daricaldwell/viewer-storm-1716-convexdecomp/commits/61c4e4e1e6367abeca98aed4cd93c3066e089d87 https://bitbucket.org/daricaldwell/viewer-storm-1716-convexdecomp/commits/399ba104ad126d0fd1b11c7b9ddf5d2b7b4cedcc https://bitbucket.org/daricaldwell/viewer-storm-1716-convexdecomp/commits/4bc78fd50de48a54af114c83bc2f5eba336e2a4b https://bitbucket.org/daricaldwell/viewer-storm-1716-convexdecomp/commits/ec35d3400da42a89c0ed1f55e3922991f98fc272 these were against LL viewer 3.3.4, pulled from FS, and compiled successfully. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Nicky Perian wrote: > I'm guessing it has been awhile since you built a viewer. Another guess it > is not an SL viewer as you are looking for HACD. > > Suggest you look at Dolphin, Firestorm, or Kokua and sort out the library > changes from their sources. > > Nicky > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Laurent Bechir > *To:* opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:48 AM > *Subject:* Re: [opensource-dev] Errors while building SL viewer > > > Error message has changed, but here is still one message : > > > ld: warning: directory > '/Volumes/Maison/laurent/Documents/Secondlife/Kirsten/linden/build-darwin-i386/packages/lib/release/Release' > following -L not found > Undefined symbols: > "HACD::HACD::HACD()", referenced from: > LLConvexDecompositionImpl::genDecomposition(int&) in > libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) > LLConvexDecompositionImpl::genDecomposition(int&) in > libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) > "HACD::HACD::~HACD()", referenced from: > LLConvexDecompositionImpl::deleteDecomposition(int) in > libllconvexdecomposition.a(LLConvexDecompositionStubImpl.o) > ld: symbol(s) not found > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > What I have done : > > I've built llconvexdecomposition from : > > https://bitbucket.org/WolfpupL/llconvexdecompositionos/src > > I've ended up with libllconvexdecompositionstub.a which I've put in > packages/lib, packages/lib/release, and for the debug version in > packages/lib/debug. Since it didn't work, I've made a copy of it and > renamed it libllconvexdecomposition.a. Now I get this error message. Anyone > to help me fullfill my dream of building this release on this beautiful May > 1st day :) > > > Le 30 avr. 2013 ? 22:58, Laurent Bechir a ?crit : > > > I've fixed this error. There was a line missing in llsdmessagereader.cpp : > > default: // TypeLLSDTypeEnd, TypeLLSDNumTypes, etc. > > at the end of the switch part line 270. > > I have another error message : > > ld: library not found for -lllconvexdecomposition > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > Command /Developer/usr/bin/g++-4.2 failed with exit code 1 > hel > > hacd-darwin-20111130b for the libraries and the include files that I've > put respectively in build-darwin-i386/packages/lib and > build-darwin-i386/packages/include. I have > > kConvexDecomposition.h > llconvexdecomposition.h > ndConvexDecomposition.h > > in include > > libk_hacdConvexDecomposition.a > libnd_hacdConvexDecomposition.a > > in lib > > Is it the good files ? If yes, where should I put them to have them > discovered by ld. If no, which version of convexdecomposition I should use > in a third party build ? > > Thank you > > Le 29 avr. 2013 ? 02:24, Laurent Bechir a ?crit : > > > Hello, > > I'm trying to build Kirten's viewer for my Mac and I get this error > message : > > llsdmessagereader.cpp:270: warning: enumeration value 'TypeLLSDNumTypes' > not handled in switch > llsdmessagereader.cpp:270: warning: enumeration value 'TypeLLSDTypeEnd' > not handled in switch > > I've tried to look in llsdmessagereader.cpp, llsdmessagereader.h, llsd.h > and llsd.cpp, but I don't know what to do to fix that error. Any idea, > please ? > > Thank you > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130501/a6cdd102/attachment-0001.htm From oz at lindenlab.com Thu May 2 12:03:35 2013 From: oz at lindenlab.com (Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)) Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 15:03:35 -0400 Subject: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? In-Reply-To: <3021432.cJ1oukyvLg@sai> References: <3021432.cJ1oukyvLg@sai> Message-ID: <5182B887.8080808@lindenlab.com> On 2013-05-01 09:50 , Lance Corrimal wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that a commit in viewer-beta removed the two scripts > build_version.py and update_version_files.py from the scripts/ directory, is > that supposed to be that way? What should be used now to update the different > version files, other than vi? See https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Channel_and_Version_Requirements#Version_Number To update the first three levels of the version number, edit just one file: indra/newview/VIEWER_VERSION.txt That value is then propagated everywhere it needs to be (more places than it used to be, in fact). The fourth level number can be set manually at build time by the 'revision' environment variable; if that is not set, the build will try to use the Mercurial revision number of the current repo, or zero if it can't use that. -- *Scott Lawrence* | /Director of Open Development/ Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130502/78639f27/attachment.htm From nickyperian at yahoo.com Sat May 4 07:15:58 2013 From: nickyperian at yahoo.com (Nicky Perian) Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 07:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [opensource-dev] linux viewer building Message-ID: <1367676958.6622.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> LL has placed a cmake minimum required version of 2.8.8. debian squeeze has 2.8.2 as a default install and 2.8.7 available from squeeze backports. I have the string compare fix from nickyD / firestorm and reducing to a minimum required version in indra/CMakeLists.txt did not reveal any build errors. cmake is to version 2.8.10 and has the sources for download. Has anyone built 2.8.10 from source on debian squeeze? If so, how did it go? nicky -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130504/0acbdde3/attachment.htm From Lance.Corrimal at eregion.de Sat May 4 12:05:51 2013 From: Lance.Corrimal at eregion.de (Lance Corrimal) Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 21:05:51 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] linux viewer building In-Reply-To: <1367676958.6622.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1367676958.6622.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6644472.C3lbXs5Hz2@sai> Am Samstag, 4. Mai 2013, 07:15:58 schrieb Nicky Perian: > LL has placed a cmake minimum required version of 2.8.8. debian squeeze has > 2.8.2 as a default install and 2.8.7 available from squeeze backports. ...isn't that incompatible with their own build environment, which was still debian 5 last time I looked? cheers, LC From nickyperian at yahoo.com Sun May 5 06:10:28 2013 From: nickyperian at yahoo.com (Nicky Perian) Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 06:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [opensource-dev] linux viewer building In-Reply-To: <1367676958.6622.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1367676958.6622.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1367759428.31595.YahooMailNeo@web126104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> >>Has anyone built 2.8.10 from source on debian squeeze? If so, how did it go? Smooth as silk. I wish the viewer would compile and install that simply. Using 2.8.2 resulted in a problem late in the process when the version was trying to be set. >________________________________ > From: Nicky Perian >To: "opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com" ; "kokua-dev at lists.kokuaviewer.org" >Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2013 9:15 AM >Subject: [opensource-dev] linux viewer building > > > >LL has placed a cmake minimum required version of 2.8.8. debian squeeze has 2.8.2 as a default install and 2.8.7 available from squeeze backports. > > >I have the string compare fix from nickyD / firestorm and reducing to a minimum required version in indra/CMakeLists.txt did not reveal any build errors. > > >cmake is to version 2.8.10 and has the sources for download. > > >Has anyone built 2.8.10 from source on debian squeeze? If so, how did it go? > > >nicky > > >_______________________________________________ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130505/148cee02/attachment.htm From twisted_laws at hotmail.com Sun May 5 18:40:47 2013 From: twisted_laws at hotmail.com (Twisted Laws) Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 20:40:47 -0500 Subject: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? In-Reply-To: <5182B887.8080808@lindenlab.com> References: <3021432.cJ1oukyvLg@sai> <5182B887.8080808@lindenlab.com> Message-ID: Maybe I?m missing something here... or did someone forget to hg add this file? Its not in viewer-release or viewer-development. Twisted From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 2:03 PM To: opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? On 2013-05-01 09:50 , Lance Corrimal wrote: Hi, I just noticed that a commit in viewer-beta removed the two scripts build_version.py and update_version_files.py from the scripts/ directory, is that supposed to be that way? What should be used now to update the different version files, other than vi? See https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Channel_and_Version_Requirements#Version_Number To update the first three levels of the version number, edit just one file: indra/newview/VIEWER_VERSION.txt That value is then propagated everywhere it needs to be (more places than it used to be, in fact). The fourth level number can be set manually at build time by the 'revision' environment variable; if that is not set, the build will try to use the Mercurial revision number of the current repo, or zero if it can't use that. -- Scott Lawrence | Director of Open Development Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab | Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130505/86b2a0a6/attachment.htm From nickyperian at yahoo.com Sun May 5 19:07:44 2013 From: nickyperian at yahoo.com (Nicky Perian) Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 19:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? In-Reply-To: References: <3021432.cJ1oukyvLg@sai> <5182B887.8080808@lindenlab.com> Message-ID: <1367806064.26417.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> v-d is deprecated. v-r has not received it yet only in viewer-beta >________________________________ > From: Twisted Laws >To: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) ; opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com >Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2013 8:40 PM >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? > > > >Maybe I?m missing something here... or did someone forget to hg add this file?? Its not in viewer-release or viewer-development. >? >Twisted? >From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) >Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 2:03 PM >To: opensource-dev at lists.secondlife.com >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] whatever happened to the versioning scripts? >? On 2013-05-01 09:50 , Lance Corrimal wrote: > >Hi, I just noticed that a commit in viewer-beta removed the two scripts build_version.py and update_version_files.py from the scripts/ directory, is that supposed to be that way? What should be used now to update the different version files, other than vi? >See https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Channel_and_Version_Requirements#Version_Number > >To update the first three levels of the version number, edit just one file: indra/newview/VIEWER_VERSION.txt > >That value is then propagated everywhere it needs to be (more places than it used to be, in fact). > >The fourth level number can be set manually at build time by the 'revision' environment variable; if that is not set, the build will try to use the Mercurial revision number of the current repo, or zero if it can't use that. > > > >-- > >Scott Lawrence | Director of Open Development >Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden > >Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces >SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU >________________________________ > _______________________________________________ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges >_______________________________________________ >Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130505/f6e53335/attachment.htm From kadah.coba at gmail.com Tue May 7 10:26:42 2013 From: kadah.coba at gmail.com (Kadah) Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:26:42 -0700 Subject: [opensource-dev] DSG Experiment needs a few more Participants; Distributed Scene Graph Experiment (100's of Virtual World Simultaneous Users Online) In-Reply-To: <20130321205811.3ab0a1f2.sldev@free.fr> References: <1363874601.22187.YahooMailNeo@web126106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20130321205811.3ab0a1f2.sldev@free.fr> Message-ID: <51893952.8030807@gmail.com> From oz at lindenlab.com Tue May 7 11:11:30 2013 From: oz at lindenlab.com (Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)) Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:11:30 -0400 Subject: [opensource-dev] Terms Of Service change re: L$ exchange Message-ID: <518943D2.5000709@lindenlab.com> Linden Lab has made a change to the Terms of Service - see the blog post at http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Featured-News/Updated-Second-Life-Terms-of-Service/ba-p/1996185 If you are a viewer developer, and your viewer includes use of a third party exchange for functions like 'buy L$,' it will need to be changed to use the LindeX instead. -- *Scott Lawrence* | /Director of Open Development/ Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130507/a4fc542b/attachment.htm From oz at lindenlab.com Tue May 7 12:17:02 2013 From: oz at lindenlab.com (Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)) Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:17:02 -0400 Subject: [opensource-dev] Terms Of Service change re: L$ exchange In-Reply-To: <518943D2.5000709@lindenlab.com> References: <518943D2.5000709@lindenlab.com> Message-ID: <5189532E.40203@lindenlab.com> On 2013-05-07 14:11 , Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > Linden Lab has made a change to the Terms of Service - see the blog > post at > > http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Featured-News/Updated-Second-Life-Terms-of-Service/ba-p/1996185 > > If you are a viewer developer, and your viewer includes use of a third > party exchange for functions like 'buy L$,' it will need to be changed > to use the LindeX instead. Please don't send me questions about this policy change.... I almost certainly don't know the answers, and certainly could not respond in any event. -- *Scott Lawrence* | /Director of Open Development/ Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130507/5e9193b0/attachment.htm From sldev at free.fr Thu May 9 02:29:57 2013 From: sldev at free.fr (Henri Beauchamp) Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 11:29:57 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] Outdated master message template In-Reply-To: <5189532E.40203@lindenlab.com> References: <518943D2.5000709@lindenlab.com> <5189532E.40203@lindenlab.com> Message-ID: <20130509112957.4fa946e7.sldev@free.fr> Greetings. While compiling the viewer, I get: --------- Verifying message template master: http://bitbucket.org/lindenlab/master-message-template/raw/tip/message_template.msg current: /usr/src/linden/scripts/messages/message_template.msg --- PASS --- Newer in message ObjectFlagUpdate: has 1 extra blocks in message AvatarAppearance: has 1 extra blocks in message SimStats: has 1 extra blocks in message GodUpdateRegionInfo: has 1 extra blocks in message RegionHandshake: has 1 extra blocks in message RegionInfo: has 1 extra blocks --------- The ObjectFlagUpdate change dates back from the new Physics parameters (introduced at the same time as meshes), and I already signaled it back then, see: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/2012-April/008902.html The other messages have been introduced with SSB support, mainly... Anyone left, at LL, to update this simple file ?... Thanks in advance, Henri. From TammyNowotny at mac.com Thu May 9 20:33:13 2013 From: TammyNowotny at mac.com (Tammy Nowotny) Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 23:33:13 -0400 Subject: [opensource-dev] development viewer Message-ID: <518C6A79.30204@mac.com> Are there going to be more versions of the Second Life Development Viewer? It recently became harder to find on the wiki website, and the latest version I can find is Second Life version 3.5.2.274789, dated April 25, 2013. From darien.caldwell at gmail.com Thu May 9 22:51:32 2013 From: darien.caldwell at gmail.com (Darien Caldwell) Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 22:51:32 -0700 Subject: [opensource-dev] development viewer In-Reply-To: <518C6A79.30204@mac.com> References: <518C6A79.30204@mac.com> Message-ID: Per the new release process, I don't think there will be any more. http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Tools-and-Technology/A-New-Process-for-Viewer-Releases/ba-p/1990547 On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Tammy Nowotny wrote: > Are there going to be more versions of the Second Life Development > Viewer? It recently became harder to find on the wiki website, and the > latest version I can find is Second Life version 3.5.2.274789, dated > April 25, 2013. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130509/e4119603/attachment.htm From laurent.bechir at madonie.org Sat May 11 10:15:21 2013 From: laurent.bechir at madonie.org (Laurent Bechir) Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 19:15:21 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? Message-ID: Hello, I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion 10.8.3. 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z WARNING: initViewer: Application init failed. 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z INFO: unix_post_minidump_callback: generated minidump: /tmp/C87252A0-34CD-4BF1-BF3E-CA344FA51F9B.dmp 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z INFO: handleViewerCrash: Handle viewer crash entry. 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z INFO: handleViewerCrash: Last render pool type: 0 Is this project still maintained ? If yes, how should I report this problem on the Jira. Is there a special section for Alternates viewers ? Thank you From geenz at geenzo.com Sat May 11 10:38:14 2013 From: geenz at geenzo.com (Geenzian Catenstien) Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:38:14 -0700 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4262523867161415497@unknownmsgid> It's still being worked on. I've just been a bit busy with the materials project is all. :p Sent from my iPhone On May 11, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Laurent Bechir wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion 10.8.3. > > 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z WARNING: initViewer: Application init failed. > 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z INFO: unix_post_minidump_callback: generated minidump: /tmp/C87252A0-34CD-4BF1-BF3E-CA344FA51F9B.dmp > 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z INFO: handleViewerCrash: Handle viewer crash entry. > 2013-05-11T17:10:22Z INFO: handleViewerCrash: Last render pool type: 0 > > Is this project still maintained ? If yes, how should I report this problem on the Jira. Is there a special section for Alternates viewers ? > > Thank you > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges From secret.argent at gmail.com Sat May 11 13:38:43 2013 From: secret.argent at gmail.com (Argent Stonecutter) Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 15:38:43 -0500 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0DDD5B22-9A56-4F6D-A48D-5CC2E662EAFB@gmail.com> On 2013-05-11, at 12:15, Laurent Bechir wrote: > I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion 10.8.3. I think replacing the arguments.txt file with the one from the original fixes the crash on startup. It did for me. From laurent.bechir at madonie.org Sat May 11 16:57:42 2013 From: laurent.bechir at madonie.org (Laurent Bechir) Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 01:57:42 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? In-Reply-To: <0DDD5B22-9A56-4F6D-A48D-5CC2E662EAFB@gmail.com> References: <0DDD5B22-9A56-4F6D-A48D-5CC2E662EAFB@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4A0C8961-DDF3-437D-92AE-91C49831266C@madonie.org> It works, thank you. In fact, I didn't replaced the argument file, I've just removed its content which was : --channel "Project Viewer - Cocoa" --grid aditi --helperuri http://preview-aditi.secondlife.com/helpers/ --settings settings_aditi_projectviewer-cocoa.xml which means that it was meant to connect to aditi when I've put Agni in my settings. That's perhaps why it was freezing. Is "--channel "Project Viewer - Cocoa"" a mandatory argument ? Le 11 mai 2013 ? 22:38, Argent Stonecutter a ?crit : > On 2013-05-11, at 12:15, Laurent Bechir wrote: >> I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion 10.8.3. > > I think replacing the arguments.txt file with the one from the original fixes the crash on startup. It did for me. > From paulhanson47 at googlemail.com Sat May 11 23:19:55 2013 From: paulhanson47 at googlemail.com (Paul Hanson) Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 07:19:55 +0100 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? In-Reply-To: <4A0C8961-DDF3-437D-92AE-91C49831266C@madonie.org> References: <0DDD5B22-9A56-4F6D-A48D-5CC2E662EAFB@gmail.com> <4A0C8961-DDF3-437D-92AE-91C49831266C@madonie.org> Message-ID: On May 12, 2013 12:57 AM, "Laurent Bechir" wrote: > > It works, thank you. In fact, I didn't replaced the argument file, I've > just removed its content which was : > > --channel "Project Viewer - Cocoa" --grid aditi --helperuri > http://preview-aditi.secondlife.com/helpers/ --settings > settings_aditi_projectviewer-cocoa.xml > > which means that it was meant to connect to aditi when I've put Agni in my > settings. That's perhaps why it was freezing. Is "--channel "Project Viewer > - Cocoa"" a mandatory argument ? > > > Le 11 mai 2013 ? 22:38, Argent Stonecutter a > ?crit : > > > On 2013-05-11, at 12:15, Laurent Bechir > wrote: > >> I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, > and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion > 10.8.3. > > > > I think replacing the arguments.txt file with the one from the original > fixes the crash on startup. It did for me. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130512/1ac81409/attachment.htm From laurent.bechir at madonie.org Sun May 12 17:25:56 2013 From: laurent.bechir at madonie.org (Laurent Bechir) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 02:25:56 +0200 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? In-Reply-To: References: <0DDD5B22-9A56-4F6D-A48D-5CC2E662EAFB@gmail.com> <4A0C8961-DDF3-437D-92AE-91C49831266C@madonie.org> Message-ID: <87CB54A4-0F1D-4D58-B8F0-1A1BC573FB82@madonie.org> I guess something went wrong, since your message is empty Le 12 mai 2013 ? 08:19, Paul Hanson a ?crit : > On May 12, 2013 12:57 AM, "Laurent Bechir" wrote: > > It works, thank you. In fact, I didn't replaced the argument file, I've just removed its content which was : > > --channel "Project Viewer - Cocoa" --grid aditi --helperuri http://preview-aditi.secondlife.com/helpers/ --settings settings_aditi_projectviewer-cocoa.xml > > which means that it was meant to connect to aditi when I've put Agni in my settings. That's perhaps why it was freezing. Is "--channel "Project Viewer - Cocoa"" a mandatory argument ? > > > Le 11 mai 2013 ? 22:38, Argent Stonecutter a ?crit : > > > On 2013-05-11, at 12:15, Laurent Bechir wrote: > >> I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion 10.8.3. > > > > I think replacing the arguments.txt file with the one from the original fixes the crash on startup. It did for me. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130513/c6d30aa5/attachment.htm From oz at lindenlab.com Wed May 15 16:32:28 2013 From: oz at lindenlab.com (Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:32:28 -0400 Subject: [opensource-dev] Is the Cocoa project still alive ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51941B0C.30006@lindenlab.com> On 2013-05-11 13:15 , Laurent Bechir wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't seen any new build of the Cocoa Project viewer since 02-28, and the last one freezes on startup on my Macbook Air with Mountain Lion 10.8.3. Yes, it's just in temporary suspended animation - we'll thaw it out very soon. -- *Scott Lawrence* | /Director of Open Development/ Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130515/e20833be/attachment.htm From sitearm at gmail.com Tue May 21 13:26:11 2013 From: sitearm at gmail.com (Sitearm) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:26:11 -0500 Subject: [opensource-dev] Announcing the first online OpenSimulator Community Conference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ; Announcing the first online OpenSimulator Community Conference http://justincc.org/blog/2013/05/20/announcing-the-first-online-opensimulator-community-conference/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130521/7dbf182e/attachment.htm From oz at lindenlab.com Fri May 24 08:18:17 2013 From: oz at lindenlab.com (Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:18:17 -0400 Subject: [opensource-dev] code review in the new release process In-Reply-To: <1369277954.2176.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1369277954.2176.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <519F84B9.8070706@lindenlab.com> On 2013-05-22 22:59 , Nicky Perian asks: > Which repositories will be used to open code review? Will each project > be available for code review? An excellent pair of questions... I'll take them in reverse order. *How will you know which repositories are active, and will they be reviewable?* Our intent is that sources for development projects will become publicly visible /approximately/ when both: * A public test viewer is made available (whether as a Project or Beta viewer) * The design, especially any server interactions, is believed to be reasonably stable (if the goal of releasing a viewer is to find out whether or not a particular design works, we don't want to put the sources out where someone might pull them because then important changes to the design may create compatibility problems; the materials project kept its sources private for some time for this reason). I say approximately because each project will make that decision independently; for some, making sources public may be a high priority (such as getting important bug fixes out where others can pick them up), while others may take longer. This is a guideline for our teams, not a hard and fast promise, but we are very much aware that it's in our interest to get new features adopted by the open source community in a timely way, so we have ample motivation to make sources public. To that end, I will be maintaining a wiki page that will display all of our Viewer channels and the latest viewers in the channel. Channels that include candidate viewer cohorts (normally only the release channel) will display both the default viewer and the candidates. For each viewer, there will be a link to the repository, the changeset id it was built from, and an indicator as to whether or not that repository is public. I've already created the program to generate this page content, and will try to update the page promptly when changes are made. The page will appear shortly after we begin using the new viewer version management system (the generation program relies on queries against that service). Incidentally - this will be separate from the user-oriented official Alternate Viewers page, which will provide the download links for each publicly available viewer. Bitbucket provides a 'watch' feature you can use to be notified when changes are made to repository - you can use that to monitor both viewer-release and any other repository, so I won't be configuring email notices on any of the new repositories. *Which brings us to code reviews...* The ReviewBoard instance at codereview.secondlife.com has been valuable, I think, but it has some significant problems - specifically it: * Isn't integrated with Jira * Isn't integrated with Bitbucket * Requires fairly complex manipulation to post reviews of code in repositories not directly descended from one of the configured repos (see Posting Failure in the wiki documentation) This goes directly to Nickys question, really, and I am not crazy about the idea of constantly having to configure each project repository... if only because it would get cluttered very quickly * Is rather a pain for me to keep up to date (updates require that I re-merge changes we need that for some reason the developers have never integrated my contributions for)... we're actually pretty far behind the most recent releases as a result. Since I set up that review system, Bitbucket has significantly improved their display of differences in a commit and added some code review features (I like to think that my quite detailed feedback to them on this played some part in that). If you display the page for a specific commit, there is a way to comment on both the commit as a whole (a box at the top) and on any specific line (click on the speech bubble to the left of the line). The comments are then both mailed to the author of the commit and displayed on the page. There's a way to reply to each, and there's an Approve button at the top that registers your approval of the commit. Using Bitbucket for reviews would place a premium on arranging your changes as a single commit that does not have any embedded merges. As a former/sometime git user, I prefer to do that anyway. It's a little less convenient in Mercurial, but it's not that hard. On the whole, I think that using the Bitbucket review system would be much easier than the existing ReviewBoard; it seems to me that the only significant disadvantage is that it doesn't post review requests to this list, but putting together an email with a link doesn't seem to me to be too much to ask. Opinions? Experiments? -- *Scott Lawrence* | /Director of Open Development/ Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130524/d682c15d/attachment-0001.htm -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Lirusaito" Subject: Re: [Bitbucket] Commit e6292c4: CHOP-942: fix crash if update check times out (lindenlab/viewer-3.5.3) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:00:48 -0000 Size: 8761 Url: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130524/d682c15d/attachment-0002.eml -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Lirusaito" Subject: Re: [Bitbucket] Commit e6292c4: CHOP-942: fix crash if update check times out (lindenlab/viewer-3.5.3) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:01:08 -0000 Size: 16887 Url: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130524/d682c15d/attachment-0003.eml From nickyperian at yahoo.com Fri May 24 08:35:19 2013 From: nickyperian at yahoo.com (Nicky Perian) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 08:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [opensource-dev] code review in the new release process In-Reply-To: <519F84B9.8070706@lindenlab.com> References: <1369277954.2176.YahooMailNeo@web126101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <519F84B9.8070706@lindenlab.com> Message-ID: <1369409719.75949.YahooMailNeo@web126103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> +1 I like the bitbucket reviews. For me, the code review tools has always required a bit of re-learning at each submission. >________________________________ > From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) >To: Nicky Perian ; opensource-dev >Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 10:18 AM >Subject: Re: code review in the new release process > > > >On 2013-05-22 22:59 , Nicky Perian asks: > >Which repositories will be used to open code review? Will each project be available for code review? >An excellent pair of questions... I'll take them in reverse order. > >How will you know which repositories are active, and will they be reviewable? > >Our intent is that sources for development projects will become publicly visible approximately when both: >> >> * A public test viewer is made available (whether as a Project or Beta viewer) >> * The design, especially any server interactions, is believed to be reasonably stable >>(if the goal of releasing a viewer is to find out whether or not a particular design works, we don't want to put the sources out where someone might pull them because then important changes to the design may create compatibility problems; the materials project kept its sources private for some time for this reason). I say approximately because each project will make that decision independently; for some, making sources public may be a high priority (such as getting important bug fixes out where others can pick them up), while others may take longer.? This is a guideline for our teams, not a hard and fast promise, but we are very much aware that it's in our interest to get new features adopted by the open source community in a timely way, so we have ample motivation to make sources public. >> >>To that end, I will be maintaining a wiki page that will display all of our Viewer channels and the latest viewers in the channel.? Channels that include candidate viewer cohorts (normally only the release channel) will display both the default viewer and the candidates.? For each viewer, there will be a link to the repository, the changeset id it was built from, and an indicator as to whether or not that repository is public.?? I've already created the program to generate this page content, and will try to update the page promptly when changes are made.? The page will appear shortly after we begin using the new viewer version management system (the generation program relies on queries against that service).? Incidentally - this will be separate from the user-oriented official Alternate Viewers page, which will provide the download links for each publicly available viewer. >> >>Bitbucket provides a 'watch' feature you can use to be notified when changes are made to repository - you can use that to monitor both viewer-release and any other repository, so I won't be configuring email notices on any of the new repositories. >>Which brings us to code reviews... > >The ReviewBoard instance at codereview.secondlife.com has been valuable, I think, but it has some significant problems - specifically it:? > > * Isn't integrated with Jira > * Isn't integrated with Bitbucket > * Requires fairly complex manipulation to post reviews of code in repositories not directly descended from one of the configured repos (see Posting Failure in the wiki documentation) >This goes directly to Nickys question, really, and I am not crazy about the idea of constantly having to configure each project repository... if only because it would get cluttered very quickly > > * Is rather a pain for me to keep up to date >(updates require that I re-merge changes we need that for some reason the developers have never integrated my contributions for)... we're actually pretty far behind the most recent releases as a result. Since I set up that review system, Bitbucket has significantly improved their display of differences in a commit and added some code review features (I like to think that my quite detailed feedback to them on this played some part in that).? If you display the page for a specific commit, there is a way to comment on both the commit as a whole (a box at the top) and on any specific line (click on the speech bubble to the left of the line).? The comments are then both mailed to the author of the commit and displayed on the page.? There's a way to reply to each, and there's an Approve button at the top that registers your approval of the commit. > >Using Bitbucket for reviews would place a premium on arranging your changes as a single commit that does not have any embedded merges.?? As a former/sometime git user, I prefer to do that anyway.? It's a little less convenient in Mercurial, but it's not that hard. > >On the whole, I think that using the Bitbucket review system would be much easier than the existing ReviewBoard; it seems to me that the only significant disadvantage is that it doesn't post review requests to this list, but putting together an email with a link doesn't seem to me to be too much to ask. > >Opinions?? Experiments? > > >-- > >Scott Lawrence | Director of Open Development >Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden > >Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces >SECOND LIFE | PATTERNS | CREATORVERSE | DIO | VERSU >Lirusaito commented on commit e6292c4 > Lirusaito commented on commit e6292c4: >CHOP-942: fix crash if update check times out >Words >View this commit or add a comment by replying to this email. >Unwatch this commit to stop receiving email updates. >Lirusaito commented on commit e6292c4 >indra/viewer_components/updater/llupdatechecker.cpp >121 - memcpy(mUniqueId, uniqueid, MD5HEX_STR _SIZE); >122 - mWillingToTest = willing_to_test; > 126 + std::string check Url = buildUrl(hostU rl, servicePath, cha nnel, version, platf orm, platform_versio n, uniqueid, willing _to_test); > 127 + LL_INFOS("Updater Service") << "checki ng for updates at " << checkUrl << LL_EN DL; > Lirusaito commented on commit e6292c4: >CHOP-942: fix crash if update check times out >Words about this specific line >View this commit or add a comment by replying to this email. >123 128 >124 - mProtocol = sProto colVersion; >125 - >Unwatch this commit to stop receiving email updates. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20130524/c2431ce4/attachment-0001.htm