[opensource-dev] Replacement class for LLDynamicArray

[Nicky D.]

>
>
> > I notice "operator[](i)" is used in the interesting,
>
> With std::vector, you could also use array.at(i), which is equivalent.
>
>
vector::at will do a runtime check if the index is out of bounds, in that
case it throws
an exception.

vector::operator[] will not do this check, causing undefined behavior when
accessing
elements out of bounds.

Nicky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20140509/8fa4aa1c/attachment.htm