[opensource-dev] Avatar Hover Height feature

Lance Corrimal Lance.Corrimal at eregion.de
Tue Feb 3 10:31:19 PST 2015


The simple fact of the matter is that Henri believes that some parts of
the LL contribution agreement violate french law, but neither him nor LL
actually think of asking a lawyer to have a look if that is true or not.

Am 03.02.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Harold Brown:
> The simple fact of the matter is.  If you do not sign a code
> contribution agreement LL can NOT use your code.  
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Henri Beauchamp <sldev at free.fr
> <mailto:sldev at free.fr>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:05:20 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
>     > On 2015-01-31 07:53 , Henri Beauchamp wrote:
>     > > Greetings,
>     > >
>     > > I know this should be posted in the JIRA, but apparently the
>     comments in
>     > > the existing issue (SUN-38) are not read or not taken into
>     account by
>     > > Lindens.
>     > >
>     > > Please, to any and all Linden(s) involved in AHH, do read this
>     post for
>     > > your own enlightement (and hopefully, a better and definitive
>     solution
>     > > for the SL community as a whole):
>     > > http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1494&p=6890#p6890
>     > >
>     > > Note that I'm beyond the point to care about whether this
>     message will
>     > > be taken into account or not (so it's perfectly useless to enter a
>     > > sterile argument on this list about it). It's more like a bottled
>     > > message I throw into the sea...
>     >
>     > I won't speculate on whether or not we would have decided to do it
>     > differently had your suggestion actually been made when we were
>     starting
>     > work on this months ago; the factors affecting avatar height and
>     avatar
>     > vertical offset are quite complicated and it may or may not have
>     been
>     > the right thing to do. I will say that your input would
>     certainly have
>     > been considered had you been a part of the conversation at the time
>     > rather than posting a note on our private forum well after the fact.
>
>     Are you ***kidding*** me ????
>
>     I have been attending quite a few Server group meetings with Nyx, and
>     you even were there once (for sure) or twice (can't swear on it), when
>     I spoke about the SUN-38 issue.
>     You will find several agendas with my entry about SUN-38, in the Wiki:
>     http://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=henri+sun-38&fulltext=Search
>     Most of the corresponding transcripts are alas missing from the Wiki,
>     but I *did* explain my solution in at least two of those meetings
>     and I will point out one particular agenda, where I asked if SPEAKING
>     with a Linden about SUN-38 and the possible solutions would be at all
>     possible:
>     http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Mesh/Archive/2013-04-29
>
>     It's not my fault if you keep shrugging off every remark or proposal
>     I make, or even refuse the dialog (in plain text, because I cannot
>     articulate well enough English neither understand English spoken
>     with the US American accent in real time).
>     I will not even bother quoting the various emails I sent to
>     *YOU*, Oz, and that you never replied (albeit about other subjects
>     than SUN-38), but if you want them, I could dig in my backups...
>
>     > Despite the fact that you refuse to contribute your code,
>
>     Again you are reverting the roles here !!!!
>
>     I never refused to contribute my code: it's GPL and always said
>     that anyone (and yes, that includes *you* Lindens) could reuse it.
>     Also, each time someone asked for permissionto make my code LGPL
>     to be compatible with their own viewer, I always said "go for it !".
>
>     What I refuse, however, is to sign a contribution agreement where
>     I would have to give private data to perfect strangers residing
>     in a foreign country that doesn't respect the privacy protection
>     Law of *my* country (or of any other country for that purpose).
>     You perfectly know this, for I explained it to you (and to Soft
>     Linden, your predecessor) countless times in emails, even going
>     down to give you pointers to paragraphs in the (English-
>     translated even !) French Law "Informatique et Liberté".
>
>     I am not the one refusing to contribute my code, YOU are the one(s)
>     refusing to use my contributions because of stupid and pointless
>     lawyer-induced bureaucracy. It is *YOUR* choice and *YOUR* refusal,
>     not mine !!!
>
>     > I'm happy to make sure that your input is considered if and when
>     > you provide it in a timely way;
>
>     I am the very initiator of the SUN-38 issue, and if you re-read the
>     comments I made in it, my solution is exposed here as well (see
>     the comment posted on 22/Jun/14 10:58 AM, in reply to the Firestorm
>     team's proposal, i.e. QUITE in the TIMELY manner !!!).
>
>     I ALWAYS gave pointers to major flaws and regressions, either in the
>     form of a JIRA issue, or directly via emails (to YOU !!!). So,
>     accusing me of not providing the info or not in a timely manner is
>     quite INSULTING and a pure LIE from your part.
>
>     > I hope that in the future you'll chose to engage more productively.
>
>     I hope that in the future, you will actually read the JIRAs I
>     initiate,
>     the emails I send to you, the messages I post on the various
>     boards and
>     blogs you DO frequent as well as I do (Nalate's blog, to cite just
>     one).
>     I also hope that you will make the minimum effort to communicate in a
>     way that a non-English speaking person such as myself can actually
>     manage (Open Source meetings used to happen in CHAT and not in voice,
>     when Soft Linden was still there... and I DID tell you in one of your
>     first meetings that people like me COULDN'T attend your meetings
>     because
>     of the language barrier: I can find the log, if you wish...).
>
>     Now, I would *much* more prefer a clever and fruitful collaboration
>     to this sterile childish behaviour (ignoring me, then putting the
>     fault on me for not participating. I think that in 8+ years of SLing,
>     I *never stopped* participating !).
>
>     A *pissed* off (BIG TIME !)...
>
>     Henri.
>     _______________________________________________
>     Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>     http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>     Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated
>     posting privileges
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20150203/bc95496b/attachment.htm 


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list