[opensource-dev] viewer64 SL_Launcher

[Nicky Perian]

Keep forgetting reply all. To complete the record;
I tried to forcing Integrated Graphics (Intel) and Enhanced Graphics
(Nvidia) and there is no difference.

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Nat Goodspeed <nat at lindenlab.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Nicky Perian <nickyperian at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On my alienware it is a Nvidia setting to use its driver as default and
>> can also be set for a specific *.exe program name.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Jonathan Welch <jhwelch at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Some systems have two built in graphics chips such as Lenovo laptops
>>> with a system called Optimus. One graphics chip is very weak and the other
>>> much stronger, bit also more power hungry. As I recall it took a while to
>>> register the .EXE name with Nvidia so the stronger chip runs the viewer.
>>>
>>> Is this registration underway already?
>>>
>>
> I don't know about that registration, but will ask.
>
> What I think you're saying, though, is that detection of the issue may be
> complicated. In fact it might be impossible for SL_Launcher.exe to detect
> which potential graphics driver is configured to handle our viewer. Is that
> a fair statement?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20170630/bcbda56a/attachment.htm