[sldev] Opensl on SPARC..... Not yet....
Dana Fagerstrom
Dana.Fagerstrom at Sun.COM
Mon Apr 16 06:23:50 PDT 2007
Folks,
I've been quietly watching this alias. One of my new tasks is to get a
Solaris pkg of the viewer built for x86/x64 and SPARC. Though these
aren't "official" builds the work should help opensl. I have an x86
version of the pkg done but discovered that my graphics card doesn't
support 32-bit color. Therefore I have yet to test it. Once I get an
appropriate platform for testing I plan on using DTrace to look for hot
spots in the code.
I also attempted a build on SPARC. All looks good but the GL-related
#ifdef's need to be tweaked because we don't support Mesa on SPARC.
Luckily the Darwin "branches" look much more compatible so we'll see.
The entire project may be re-prioritized and placed on the back burner
but I'll be sure to push my changes to opensl.org as soon as I'm happy
with them.
Dana
Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 16:43 -0700, James Cook wrote:
>> Yeah, it's those pesky 1 GHz Athlon Thunderbirds that I worry about.
>> I'll dig into our CPU statistics and see if anyone still uses those with
>> SL. If not, I'll turn on SSE instructions in the builds.
>
> I do.
>
> The other advantage of autovectorization is you get support for PPC
> AltiVec and x86_64 and whatever else may come about for free. I wonder
> if spot has tried compiling slviewer on a SPARC yet...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
More information about the SLDev
mailing list