[sldev] Re: OS-SL Development Issues (was Upcoming viewer releases)

[Dale Glass]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:29:02AM -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> But *right now* what we have in SL groups isn't usable for this kind  
> of collaboration. Mailing lists are. SL is good for virtual face to  
> face, but it's not for discussions like this, and I'm not sure that  
> even with all of the above it should be.
But I wasn't talking about the mailing list, I was talking about IRC.
Although a newsgroup in SL would be nice to have.

My point is: SL group IM is pretty much identical to IRC. In fact in
some respects, IMO much better. Excepting the horrible performance we're
having lately, of course.

So why add the need to run an extra program and make people have to keep
up with what's going there when the functionality already present in SL
could be used instead?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070829/f1724988/attachment.pgp