[sldev] Mailing list chatter

[Argent Stonecutter]

From: Ettore Pasquini
> I think this is a good way of splitting. However, although  
> splitting makes
> the list easier to read, I think things that are naturally inter- 
> related
> should be in the same list. For instance, stability and performance  
> are too
> pervasive to be separate. Almost every sub-system can affect  
> stability.
> Similarly for performance, although in SL it's more bound to  
> critical areas
> (such as graphics).

By all means, this was just off the top of my head. ^^

> sldev-meta (policies, licensing, etc. everything non-strictly  
> engineering)

That was what I was envisioning the -chat catchall would include.

sldev-licensing, for example, well be be worth its own list.