[sldev] The criminalization of open source

[Dale Glass]

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:54:53PM +0100, Nicholaz Beresford wrote:
> 
> Actually, just for the record,  I will not bother to undo that if
> the Lindens make that change.  My focus has always been performance,
> stability and usability and I don't see where this change makes a 
> difference in any those areas.
Heh, I was actually considering keeping it in mine.

We have different niches here, if your is performance and stability,
mine is advanced functionality.

Since we're at it, does anybody NEED it back? For practical usage for
some purpose, and not as a political statement I mean.

> It's merely a placeholder for something much bigger, and my life
> is just too short to enter the arena of political or religious
> issues in SL.
I'm not that interested in politics myself either. My philosophy is that
if it's useful, it'd rather keep it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20071218/e01cfb8c/attachment.pgp