[sldev] Automatically backing up scripts locally.

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 2007-12-20, at 20:31, Dzonatas wrote:
> Argent Stonecutter wrote:
>> On 2007-12-20, at 18:18, Dzonatas wrote:
>>> Argent Stonecutter wrote:
>>>> In addition, the relationship between the backed-up assets and  
>>>> in-world object is out of scope of COLLADA.
>>>

>>> It probably appears out of scope because the published  
>>> implementation of COLLADA uses a more standalone-ish server.
>>

>> I'm going by the specification, not any implementation.
>

> There is some confusion here then. How do you see that there is a  
> difference between the two assets you stated?

What do you mean? I'm talking about the relationship between them,  
not the differences between them.

> A directory tree, you mean pointing back to your ideal scheme?

The backup layout I described *is* a directory tree. Each line is the  
name of a file, directory, or symlink.

I don't claim it's ideal, but something like it that lets me deal  
with assets at the file level is kind of a requirement. Whether the  
individual xml files are in Linden Labs' XML format or in some  
COLLADA format is orthogonal.