[sldev] Re: Plugin architecture

[dirk husemann]

Mark Wagner wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Ben Byer <sldev at bushing.mm.st> wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2007, at 5:55 PM, soft at softnoel.org wrote:
>>
>> > [...] and LL-triggered plugin invalidation possible.
>>
>> Whoa.  Everyone, raise your hand if you think this is a good idea.
>
> Certainly.  Particularly once the server code is open-sourced, it
> would be nice for a server to be able to say that certain plugins
> can't be used with it - say, an av scanner in a combat sim.
what exactly prevents me from running a client that just ignores this?

    cheers,
    dirk



-- 
dr dirk husemann, pervasive computing, ibm zurich research lab
--- hud at zurich.ibm.com --- +41 44 724 8573 --- SL: dr scofield


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070222/286d55a6/signature.pgp