Reply-to (take 2) (Re: [sldev] Re: Lookup Tables and Texture Bugs)

[Rob Lanphier]

On 1/25/07 5:09 PM, Jesse Nesbitt wrote:
> Munge it, please, reply-to-all is annoying in this situation.
You may file an issue under MISC if you really, really want me to change
it, and I would suggest we take further discussion to JIRA rather than
this mailing list.  In short, my answer is "no" for the reasons in that
essay.  I've administered email lists for many, many years, so you'll
have a difficult time changing my mind on this, but I definitely don't
want you or anyone else trying to debate the issue on the list.

Rob
> On 1/25/07, Rob Lanphier <robla at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>> On 1/25/07 2:09 PM, Gigs Taggart wrote:
>> > Grr... Why doesn't reply reply to the list??
>> You may be used to lists that munge the "Reply-to" line.  See the
>> following essay for why that is bad:
>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>
>> My email client seemed to have eaten my first "reply-to" reply.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
>> /index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070125/84cf329a/signature.pgp