A Good Deal -- XML/Handheld Devices Re: [sldev] Opening the server
source?
Dzonatas
dzonatas at dzonux.net
Wed Jul 4 19:14:22 PDT 2007
=)
Related news:
"Carlos Slim Helú"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Slim_Hel%C3%BA
"World's richest? Gates may have cashed it in"
"Second place would suit Microsoft chairman fine"
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/322239_richest04.html?source=mypi
Dana Fagerstrom wrote:
> Cool! XML without the hairballs. Excellent!
>
> Thanks,
> D
>
> Dzonatas wrote:
>> Dana Fagerstrom wrote:
>>> If folks ever hope to see a "lite" version of the viewer on say
>>> handheld devices I'd recommend scrapping the current data packer in
>>> favor of XML, XDR, SXDF, or Java-like universal encoders. Of course
>>> using XML for everything would require much too much overhead
>>> therefore a universal binary format like XDR would be more
>>> applicable. [Let the flames begin...]
>>>
>> ...
>>
>> For "lite" versions, an extreme XML validator is not needed. The
>> extreme XML validator is the default recommendation. The XML
>> validator not only slows down the XML intake process, it also has
>> been a tool in the likeness of a vendor lock-in. There is no need to
>> validate most XML in the way large businesses, like Sun's biggest
>> competitor, have recommended. I've written a clean, "what's
>> essential", XML parser that does not depend on any external website
>> for format definitions, like the kind you find in DOCTYPE headers,
>> and it is fast. There is no extra overhead when it is done that way.
>> I know it can be done.
>>
>> I personally know it (being derived from SL business features) is
>> currently in demand for the reason you state, handhelds devices.
>>
>> Being that Atomatrix is pre-Java, I'm sure you'll understand I have
>> my niche with object-orientated program environments and such patent
>> issues. For these handheld devices being used in likewise desire, I
>> might make a kind-of compromise but not really a compromise. Hmm. It
>> appears GPLv3 hurts Java technology more than anything else unlike
>> Microsoft/Novell. I *might* move Atomatrix to GPLv3, as that is my
>> current path. (I'm showing opportunity to work together... not
>> blowing steam.)
>>
>> =)
>>
>
--
Power to Change the Void
More information about the SLDev
mailing list