[sldev] https very slow.

[Dale Glass]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:51:01PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:08 +0200, Dale Glass wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 02:01:46PM -0400, Jason Giglio wrote:
> > > RC4 would be a more relevant benchmark.  RC4 is likely an order of 
> > > magnitude faster than aes-256.
> > Ok, rc4 then:
> > 
> > type  16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
> > rc4   265796.22k   334144.99k  354972.96k  366394.94k   363973.29k
> > 
> > RC4 is less than perfect though:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RC4#Fluhrer.2C_Mantin_and_Shamir_attack
> 
> Blowfish?

About the same performance as for AES:

type         16 bytes   64 bytes   256 bytes   1024 bytes  8192 bytes
blowfish cbc 93727.58k  99827.99k  101858.99k  102497.96k  103030.15k


BTW, benchmarks are done with "openssl speed"


> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070711/59bfcd06/attachment.pgp