[sldev] 1.18.0.6 uses an older version of the Boost library?
Soft Linden
soft at lindenlab.com
Wed Jul 11 18:02:52 PDT 2007
Looking at the changelists internally, the "newer" version was
actually a reversion to the other version. (A developer had upgraded
boost, only to find that the Windows upgrade didn't play well with
Linux and OS X.) I think you're just looking at our own
programmatically generated headers, which are reporting the base
version of that file for that merge.
If you do a compare on the full boost directories, try filtering out
those header lines with grep and see if there's anything left over.
On 7/11/07, Able Whitman <able.whitman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm looking at a diff I made between the 1.17.3.0 and the 1.18.0.6 source
> trees, and I'm seeing a bunch of blocks that look like this:
>
> ---
> slviewer-src-1.17.3.0\linden\/libraries/include/boost/mpl/assert.hpp
> 2007-07-06 11:46:14.000000000 -0400
> +++
> slviewer-src-1.18.0.6\linden\/libraries/include/boost/mpl/assert.hpp
> 2007-07-11 15:19:50.000000000 -0400
> @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
> // See http://www.boost.org/libs/mpl for documentation.
>
> // $Source$
> -// $Date: 2007-03-22 15:03:42 -0700 (Thu, 22 Mar 2007) $
> -// $Revision: 59599 $
> +// $Date: 2006-02-24 13:34:57 -0800 (Fri, 24 Feb 2006) $
> +// $Revision: 45264 $
>
> #include <boost/mpl/not.hpp>
> #include <boost/mpl/aux_/value_wknd.hpp>
>
> I verified that the revision 45264 files are the ones that came from the
> 1.18.0.6 win32 libraries archive I downloaded. Did 1.18 revert to an earlier
> version of the Boost libraries? Or am I imagining things?
>
> --Able
More information about the SLDev
mailing list