[sldev] llGiveInventory comedy

[Kitty]

> Despite having suggested it, I'm most in favour of option (1).
> Intuitively it makes the most sense. You're initiating 
> contact explicitly or implicitly, and making sure that 
> communication is possible would seem to be a part of that. It 
> doesn't involve confusing messages.
> In short, it behaves like people would expect, if they 
> thought it through.

If it's too easy to accidently mute someone, then that's the actual problem
that should be addressed I'd think. 

If you accidently muted someone and you pay them then the unmuting is
helpful, but if that person was supposed to be on mute then unmuting is not
what people would expect (not every transaction is about vendors).

Upon opening an IM, seeing a "You have (Name Here) muted, you will not be
able to receive inventory or see any responses." should be sufficient and it
follows the current "is offline" feature when IM'ing someone on your friends
list who's offline.

Kitty