[sldev] Valve/Steam Hardware survey.
Jason Giglio
gigstaggart at gmail.com
Wed Jun 13 20:07:28 PDT 2007
Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:12 -0400, Jason Giglio wrote:
>> It's in the official minimum requirements. But there's no requirement
>> that SL run fast on those chips, so if it's just going to be slower on
>> those chips, I say go for it. SL is probably already pretty horrible on
>> such chips, making it a little worse isn't going to matter much.
>
> Yeah, that's a solid philosophy. Lets give tax breaks to the rich as
> well. (Dzonatas isn't the only one who can stretch a metaphor. :)
To abuse it even more, taking performance away from chips made in the
last 5 years to support these platforms that can't realistically run SL
anyway, is more like taxing everyone to make sure that only homeless
bums on the street have $50,000 a year in income, even when the middle
class is being taxed to well below that income.
-Jason
More information about the SLDev
mailing list