[sldev] CPU and GPU statistics

[Soft Linden]

Looking at the blame history, this seems to have been created and
refined by half a dozen in-house developers. Should be wide-open for
any improvements.

On 6/20/07, Dirk Moerenhout <blakar at gmail.com> wrote:
> The CPU data is too generic to know which CPU's are really used. We
> really need more precise info on which extension bits are set on the
> x86 CPU's. Or at the least we'll need to update llprocessor.cpp. Now
> there are way too many unknown models. Is llprocessor.cpp derived from
> something public we can update to or do I just take the Intel and AMD
> docs and fill the gaps?
>
> Dirk aka Blakar Ogre
>
> On 6/21/07, Soft Linden <soft at lindenlab.com> wrote:
> > The question of what CPUs SL users have has come up a number of times,
> > and I believe GPUs have been mentioned as well. Attached, please find
> > statistics on CPUs and reported GPUs for all platforms over a similar
> > one week period.
> >
> > I haven't made any attempt to consolidate similar CPUs and GPUs. I
> > don't know  enough about the models to know where I might omit
> > something important, such as cache size or SIMD abilities varying
> > between two clocks of a like part model. I did remove the labels from
> > two graphic cards/drivers, where I wasn't sure that the name reported
> > was accurate, or that it didn't reveal personal information.
> >
> > I formatted this as CSV, which should parse by Excel, OpenOffice, or
> > your favorite perl script.
> >
> > Let me know if ya find any interesting surprises. If you want to take
> > a swing at summarizing, grouping by capability, or the like, that
> > would be awesome.
> >
> > If this message comes through without two attachments, then I've
> > learned a lesson about utf-8 or attachment sizes :)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> > /index.html
> >
> >
> >
>