[sldev] Possible 3rd party contract for viewer modification

[Soft Linden]

I expect you're right! I tend to go with what I know, and a viewer
change is a shallow problem for me, while I'd have to learn C# and
libsl for the other. I'd think the same were true of many on the list.

That said, so long as I'm convinced of the ability to deliver, I'm
comfortable making a connection regardless of what tools you want to
use. I certainly have no doubts at all as to whether the libsl
developers could deliver -- they've got a pretty solid track record.


On 6/20/07, Adam Frisby <adam at gwala.net> wrote:
> This is probably better served with a libsl based bot to be honest.
>
> Hacking up a client to do it would be messy at best and libsl already
> has appropriate asset upload functions inplace that would turn it into a
> 15 line C# application (plus libsl is easier to maintain than a custom
> viewer fork)
>
> Adam