[sldev] Re: Plugin architecture

[Jesse Nesbitt]

On 3/3/07, Callum Lerwick <seg at haxxed.com> wrote:
>
> *snip for length*


I agree, we're dealing with a different animal here.
Also, IIRC XUL/XPCOM/EMCAscript are interpreted languages, so you could get
away with proprietary plugins for Firefox if it were GPL. (Except for Flash
and Java, because they link dynamicaly)

> As for the GPL, it will be honored to the letter of the law. Any
> > commitment beyond that is left up to the individual. I don't let Richard
> > M. Stallman stand by me and whisper sweet nothings into my ear. Honestly
> > he creeps me out.
>
> Hey, *I* didn't choose the license...
>
> Better RMS than ESR:
>
> http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond/


I disagree. I feel that RMS is a "Free Software" zealot and wants to wipe
out all proprietary software, which is not a good thing for those who like
monetary rewards for their innovation. But that's a discussion for another
list.

_______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>
>
>


-- 
--Jesse
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070303/81a2a832/attachment.htm