[sldev] Re: Plugin architecture

[Jason Giglio]

Tim Shephard wrote:
> On 3/3/07, John Hurliman <jhurliman at wsu.edu> wrote:
>> Callum Lerwick wrote:
>> > slviewer is currently GPL, and only GPL. The GPL very explicitly
>> > disallows proprietary "derived works". This means plugins. So unless 
>> the
>> > license changes, sorry, no proprietary plugins.
>> >
>> >
> 
> Callum is right.

Not really.  The SL Viewer is GPL+FLOSS stuff.  That means the SL Viewer 
is not GPL compatible, and can't be linked with GPL code.

-Jason