[sldev] Re: Privacy Pocket

[Strife Onizuka]

He isn't talking about resizing the region, he's talk talking about moving
the regions origin (region <0,0,0>). Region origin shifts have been the
symptom of a couple long standing bugs btw. I don't know if the current
software can handle vertical region changes (moving from one region to
another vertically).

The privacy spaces suggestion has been made before, I'm not particularly
fond of it. Script communications & physics become complicated issues. To
really make things interesting, it would require reworking of Voice Chat.

If you want real privacy buy a private island and don't allow people to TP
in.

On 5/12/07, Jason Giglio <gigstaggart at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> > And there's no reason to put the region in that range anyway. It could
> > just as easily be flagged by a non-zero *global* Z coordinate as by a
> > specific *region* Z coordinate. In region coordinates it could be
> > presented as being at "-768 meters" or at "10000 meters", but when you
> > get there ground would have a zero Z coordinate but the global
> > coordinates would have an origin at <12345,67890,-768>. Since it's a
> > "sealed" volume at parcel boundaries navigation at these coordinates
> > across region boundaries simply would not happen.
>
> You must not have talked to the right linden.  Andrew has made it very
> clear to me that the current region box size is not going to be altered
> any time soon, much less adding some secondary disconnected box.
>
> -Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070512/0956edeb/attachment.htm