[sldev] Re: Privacy Pocket (Second Life)

[Jason Giglio]

Sylvio Deutsch wrote:
> But what really makes me mad is the origin of the issue... why not trust 
> people word? If someone says he is over 18, he should be. If not, where 

These privacy proposals are orthogonal to age verification.

As I pointed out, it's more than just sex.  People need privacy for many 
reasons.

This should not even be tied to the "adult" flag directly, and should be 
an extension of the normal "limit access" ACLs, allowing non-"adult 
content" privacy.

If I'm working with a client on a private NDA project, he shouldn't have 
to be age verified just to see the progress!

Adult flag could use the same code to hide the parcel from non-verified 
residents, but the option to turn on privacy without adult flag is 
important too I think.

-Jason