[sldev] Key areas for code review.

[Jason Giglio]

Alan Grimes wrote:
> Some people seem to find my posts either interesting or useful so I'll
> continue writing them. Other people seem to think I'm a total ignoramus
> who needs to have studied this codebase for 3 years before making any
> useful observations.

I think you misunderstand.  No one much cares about your type of 
"observations". You need to take your "observations" and do some actual 
testing, write some *small, mergable* patches with *proven results*, and 
then submit them.

You can keep the speculation, the "recent graduate" CS dogma, sweeping 
generalizations, and your attitude that LL devs are incompetent fools to 
yourself.  We'll all be happier.

Pointing out so many speculative "problems" based off some fuzzy idea of 
the way a particular compiler might work isn't helping anything.

-Jason