[sldev] [META] "Sandbox:" namespace on the wiki?

Lawson English lenglish5 at cox.net
Mon Nov 12 08:11:14 PST 2007


Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> I like "AWG" as a namespace. Regardless of whether it was picked by 
> the community, I don't think that the context was really what it's 
> being used for, and it's poor public relations.
>

As it stands, we have two namespaces: AWG and AW Groupies. I see no 
reason for a 3rd namespace. AW Groupies was formed to be an in-world 
group to discuss the AWG, and our stuff goes all over the place, 
including topics directly relevant to the AWG.

As I said before, when AWG and AW Groupies topics are fully aligned, and 
the material is deemed concrete enough, then the AWG tag can get added 
to said material. If not, then the AW Groupies namespace is already the 
"sandbox" namespace for technical discussions. No need for a new namespace.


Lawson


More information about the SLDev mailing list