[sldev] [META] Open source more of LSL?
Jason Giglio
gigstaggart at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 05:29:11 PST 2007
Is there any way we could have more of LSL open sourced? I'm sitting
here writing a script, and because there's no llSetLinkTexture, I'm
spending like 6 hours making this thing way more complicated than it
needs to be. I could have probably written llSetLinkTexture by now.
So can we have more of the LSL source code open sourced?
I know this'll probably get some reply about mono. I think it's pretty
obvious mono is going to stay vaporware for the foreseeable future. We
need LSL to stop sucking *now*, not 2-3 years from now. I'm sure
there's several scripters who'd be happy to provide improvements for
LSL, even if it'll all be throw away when and if mono ever happens.
-Jason
More information about the SLDev
mailing list