[sldev] [POLICY] Development by consensus (Re: Question regarding upcoming maintenance on 11/27-11/28)

[Anders Arnholm]

On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:43:26PM -0500, Hamncheese wrote:
> Rob,
>
> I don't think everyone is asking for a vote. There was considerable
> discussion and feedback from the community and then developers went
> off and did their thing seemingly without consideration to the
> concerns raised. The problem is not even that. LL as the ultimate
> architect has a right and the responsibility to pull rank when
> necessary. But without an explanation it comes off as arrogant. As an
> enterprise architect, I cringe when I see this behavior in other
> architects because it backfires without fail.

It's part of the stuff take make morev and more resident think that LL
don't care a second what there views on the worls is. This spreading,
and this may i say agnorant comunications is probalt what will make an
alterantive to SL have a big possibility on the market. LL is in now way
uniq, as best they are number two on the market. If they are to keep
there I'm sure they need to change. The feedback come from that we care,
we still do, more bashing and ignoring users makes less people care.
Soon a this spreads and LL will have a hard time fixing the reputation.

/ Balp
-- 
      o_   Anders Arnholm,               HiQ - Consultant
 o/  /\    anders at arnholm.nu             Phone  : +46-703-160969
/|_, \\    http://anders.arnholm.nu/     http://www.hiq.se
/
`
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20071123/9b6cd085/attachment.pgp