[sldev] [POLICY] Development by consensus (Re: Question
regarding upcoming maintenance on 11/27-
Matthew Dowd
matthew.dowd at hotmail.co.uk
Wed Nov 28 03:13:47 PST 2007
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:47 +0000, Matthew Dowd wrote:
>> Of course, hashing is of limited protection if someone has grabbed the
>> backend database, as they are now in a position to run large scale
>> dictionary attacks on the hashes at their leisure on their own
>> equipment!
>
> Which requires time. Time enough to detect the intrusion and reset
> everyone's password, instantly invalidating the stolen database.
Most intrusions remain undetected until they are exploited for malicious purposes!
However, I think the bottom line is:
SSL server verification has a number of advantages but also a number of disadvantages
Challenge-Response has a number of advantage but also a number of disadvantages
It isn't a clear cut decision which is the most appropriate, and I certainly wouldn't want to rule out either off hand (and there may be a third way).
However, staying with an XML-RPC authentication procedure would allow either approach (or even both).
Moving to a web form automatically rules out challenge response.
Matthew
_________________________________________________________________
Telly addicts unite!
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/tvtown.shtml
More information about the SLDev
mailing list