[sldev] [META][AWG]log chat of AWG meeting Friday, Oct 5, 2007

[Lawson English]

Lawson English wrote:
> Zha Ewry wrote:
>> yeah verrily. We need to be clear. That which we make accessible via a
>> AWG service is the bound of what we do. Many related things will
>> manifest in code. This is fine but... out of scope.  The insides of
>> clients and services will rarely be our concern. - Zha
>>   
>
> The Lindens took this attitude as well, and that is why the client is 
> a closed system that is impossible to extend.
>

Or, to put it differently: "undefined" is fine as a category, but it has 
to be spelled out, rather than left as a dangling comma at the end of 
the list of definitions...

L.