[sldev] LLVM?

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 31-Oct-2007, at 13:09, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

> Argent Stonecutter wrote:
>> I wonder if the LLVM might not be a better way to handle future
>> scripting needs than Mono.
>
> We've invested a lot of time and effort in Mono already, for better or
> worse.  This would not be a good time to context switch to  
> something else.

Yah, that's why I wrote "This wouldn't be a short term project, but  
it would be something to consider for future implementations."