[sldev] Re: [ARCH] Re: Permissions

[Callum Lerwick]

On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 05:10 -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> From: Callum Lerwick <seg at haxxed.com>
> > Its called "signing your work" and people have been doing it for
> > hundreds (thousands?) of years.
> 
> No, it's more than "signing your work". You can sign and watermark  
> your painting, but that won't tell the guy who bought it who you are  
> or what you were thinking of or the fact that it's 15 out of a  
> limited edition of 30, or anything else that's on the back of the  
> canvas, or in the colophon of the book, or the garment label. Why  
> don't you want people to be able to attach a label?

Is that what I said?

What I ment to say is you can tag and label your content however you
want, using EXIF tags or ID3 or by scribbling it all down in the corner
of a texture or whatever it is you want to do.

Its a solved issue. Its a non-issue. And it has little to nothing to do
with SL protocol design.

> > When you license content, you're licensing COMMUNISM!
> 
> Traffic lights and speed limit signs are communism too.

No, "communism" would be leasing your car from the state. Ooops, ran a
stop sign? I'm afraid you'll have to return The People's car, citizen.
Immediately.


You have a seriously myopic view of things, Argent. That much is very
clear.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070925/8df0d36d/attachment.pgp