[sldev] Re: [META] Permissions - A content creator's view

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 25-Sep-2007, at 11:23, Dale Glass wrote:
> Suppose it sounds pretty good, but I'd prefer to have a separate
> functionality for configuration instead.

So would I, but the last time I brought up a key/value based scheme I  
got knocked back. And configuration (and the 'owner' field, and  
script access) are really secondary.

> Notecards are very annoying to parse to get configuration info, and  
> are
> slow too. IMO a specific mechanism would be much preferrable.

Notecards are not my first choice, I just suggested it as an  
implementation because it may involve a smaller... and fixed size...  
change to the asset record... and thus be more palatable to LL.

See SVC-701 for another possibility... something like:

list config = llParseString2List(llGetNotice(NOTICE_OWNER),  
[";","\n"], []);