[sldev] [Upcoming Changes] Website Viewer Authentication

[Dale Glass]

On Saturday 29 September 2007 06:11:41 Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> On 28-Sep-2007, at 17:20, Dale Glass wrote:
> > I'm rather torn on this idea.
>
> I'm not torn at all. I think it stinks. It's got all the problems you
> list, plus the browser itself can be compromised... it's not like
> that's never happened.

Actually, I agree completely now. I tried to find something positive about 
it, but the more I think and read on it, the less I like it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070929/9ce6963f/attachment.pgp