[sldev] [META] Formal critique of new auth mechanism?

[Nicholaz Beresford]

Rob Lanphier wrote:
 > That's not to say that the informal conversation that's happening now
 > can't continue, but I think the proposal above is a better path than the
 > one we're on to making sure the right outcome is achieved and that the
 > most people understand why its the right outcome.  If we rely solely on
 > this email thread, our response is almost certainly going to be
 > fragmented and incomplete; we'll probably waste time responding to
 > points most people don't care about, miss points that everyone feels are
 > essential, and likely (due to human nature) respond to the weakest
 > expression of the strongest points.  Proposals for alternate process are
 > also welcome.

I think the talk page on the wiki may be a good starting point, so if
everybody could add their compressed view from the points on the mailing
list we could probably go from there.

https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Talk:Viewer_Authentication


I'll be busy most time over the weekend, but maybe going with
"Pros", "Cons", "Alternatives" sections may be a good starting point,
then distilling it into a new page

https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Talk:Viewer_Authentication_Critique


Just my two L$


Nick
---
Second Life from the inside out:
http://nicholaz-beresford.blogspot.com/